Research, plan, photocopy.
Rehearse. Explain, model, ask. Write, write, write. Share, share, share . . .
?
This is the question that Ms.
Carroll* and I are grappling with. We
did all this prep work to make student voices the center of our classroom. We believe
that’s the way classrooms should sound. We
opened our first day with Mr. Ryan’s Creative Writing class by taking them on
an Emotional Journey. We outlined the
next four days of Dizzy Drama, did a “Prop Swap” (distributed props and
settings Yankee swap-style), and provided students with space to start
brainstorming ideas – all designed to build community. We opened on Friday with a choice of writer’s
notebook prompts and invited students to share. A usually shy student, who blew
us away the previous day with his dramatic rendition of the line, “How dare you
disobey your mother,” raised his hand and read what he had written. Then . . .
Following typical English teacher
etiquette, we thanked him for sharing his response, and moved to the next
student. During the “meat” of the lesson, where we lead students through the
literal, interpretive, and analytical levels of reading (adapted slightly for
our Big Bang Theory clip, shown to
emphasize the development of character) we did the same thing. We gave students time to write responses and
share with the class. When they
generously offered their ideas, we acknowledged them with a thank you and allowed
the next student to share.
At the time, we were thinking that
we didn’t want to cut students off. We
didn’t want to say something that might steal a point that a student wanted to
make. In general, we’re also afraid of
tangents. If we get too far off track, how do we reel everyone in? We planned for all 55 of the minutes. How
will we get to everything if we talk spontaneously about metaphors, their
purpose, and some examples for 5 of those pre-planned minutes? And biggest of all, we value students. We want them to be able to share their
thoughts. We want them to come to their own understanding of the concept. Won’t
we stifle them if we keep talking?
During our post-lesson frenzy in
the hallway, Ms. Carroll and I realized that our intentions might be leading to
some unintended consequences. By not
responding more fully to the students’ contributions, we didn’t push the
students to think deeper. We didn’t guide them to make further connections
between what they know, what they produced, and what they will be learning. This is part of the reason we flew through our
observed lesson. Though we remembered
WWKGD (What Would Kelly Gallagher Do) when modeling the writing process, we
failed to model our thinking process during these discussions.
One challenge is that what we are
doing doesn’t necessarily have a right or wrong answer. It’s not like in math, where
we could point out a multiplication error or a missing step when students
explain their process. Writer’s notebook prompts are designed to initiate
engagement and to activate thinking.
Students’ responses to texts are often based on their own experience –
and human experience is not “right” or “wrong.”
I think I speak for both of us
when I say that being a Writing Center tutor has influenced our identity as
teacher candidates. We are most comfortable working one-on-one or in small
groups alongside our students. Giving feedback
comes easier, seems safer. I feel like a
different person when I am sitting next to a student sharing techniques I use
to overcome my own writing struggles than when I am up at the board trying to
synthesize students’ responses to the reading.
Dr. Cook and Mr. Ryan even said they noticed this shift in each of us.
So I guess another challenge is
just dealing with the power that comes from being the one in the front of the
room. The expert. The one in charge. Mr. Ryan reminded us that it’s okay to share
what we know. We studied this stuff for
4+ years. It’s a disservice if we don’t
clarify misunderstandings or fill in information gaps. We aren’t taking anything away from the
students’ learning by engaging in human conversation. Students need role models of integrity.
Since we still have two days of
teaching left, we have time to make a plan and strengthen this weakness. As Dr. Cook has mentioned, maybe we will jot
down a few words that stick out each time a student speaks. We can acknowledge what works about whatever
they shared and invite other students to reply back to that individual. This can also help allay the sensory overload
that comes with trying to simultaneously remember what a student said, develop
a coherent response, reflect on what you just discussed, keep an eye on the
clock, and be aware of what’s happening next in the lesson.
This week has been wonderfully “dizzy”
and I am grateful for this chance to continue to learn, in a safe and
supportive environment, what it means to be a teacher.
Thanks Ms. Carroll for being awesome.
*In every lesson, I have made the
awkward mistake of referring to Katie by her first name. I am trying to make up
for it here ;)